I have been posting on a group on facebook, entitled "realists not racists (british pride). The groups description reads:
"there is nothing racist with wanting a betta future for us and our kids future. there is 2 things wrong with this country GOVERMENT and IMMIGRANTS and RELIGION. this group is not about colour, religion or nationality that is not the problem people can be what ever they want to be so long as it doesnt affect others . its about being realistic . lets put an example . the country is a bridge and the goverment has put that much pressure on the bridge with all the problems that we go through everyday as normal people not upper class people and the only way to relieve the pressure would be to get the goverment sorted to ease the pressure . but how can they when the immigrants are jumpin on top of the bridge that will crumble and will take a long time sort out . the question is do you a) shut the borders till the goverment sorts the country out so it can help its own people and then open the borders to help people in need or do you b)while the pressure on the bridge is at breaking point do you let the immigrants jump on and let the whole country crumble so we cant help anybody. this is not racist this is being a realist lets fight for our country while we stilll have a chance . its your choice and your kids futures lets sort the goverment and shut the borders until the bridge can support us and the immigrants . and lets get rid of religous extremists hate preachers as well how can this not be racist with there hatred they shout out in our town centres and in our streets . lets get the goverment put back in there place cause the elderly are suffering and our kids are suffering lets get the priorities right elderly built us and fought for us and the kids are the future to keep buildin the country and protectin the country and we are whos trying to keep the bridge strong . this is not racistist this is being a realist stand up and be proud .then chuck the problem of religion on top if u want to believe in a religion that is supposedly peaceful then thats upto u but dont expect me to agree with it . as i see it if there was such a thing as a god then why is there so much pain and sufferin happenin in the world why is there so many differant religions and 1 god or in some religions a number of gods . yet nobody has seen or heard anything from him or her or whatever it is. so how can u worship something that u know nothing about but what certain people have told u or wrote in a religous book. all i can say is seein and hearin is believin and until i see or hear from god with my own eyes or ears i just cant understand what all the fuss is about some people would rather be known for there religious identity rather than there birth place national identity . its not god who helps u when something bad happens to u or your family its other human beings and in some cases its these religions that are causin the bad things like sexual abuse , honour killings , war, extreme terror or torture so how is this so called peaceful religion responsible for so many deaths over the years and this day and age . i think its time to look at the future without this ball and chain or noose around our necks that is being tightend by GOVERMENT,RELIGION AND IMMIGRATION who agrees. england till i die rule britannaia"
It all sounds very noble, doesn't it? Sadly this is just rhetoric. Facebook, will not allow the publication of comments which show that Islam is a religion of hate and paedophilia, even if it proves such. The fact is, freedom of speech no longer exists, we live in a police state, even social networks are controlled. We cannot even express our views on the Internet. In this very messed up ideology, we are forced to express views we do not agree with, that are not our own. Such as calling "Mohamed" a prophet - he is not a prophet, especially if you are not a follower of Islam. We now also have to refer to the "Qu'ran" as holy book, which again, if it is not your religion, then it is not a holy book. If you were to read verses from the Qu'ran (without personal comments, just straight forward verses) you can be arrested for inciting racial hatred. Does this not make you wonder why this book needs protecting by laws? What could possibly be found so offensive by whites in the Qu'ran, that we are not allowed to read aloud from it? Could that be the true sick nature of the Islamic religion? Lets find out below shall we?
The below comment, was unable to be published, since it would be seen as offensive on facebook:
"It is fact that Aisha was Mohammed's wife, and his favourite. : http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:hGjPTB9cDLgJ:www.lastprophet.info/en/content/view/787/1/+Aisha+beloved&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk
She was six years old when he married her, and nine when he "raped" her, although the official story states he consummated the marriage when she was nine - it was rape, a child cannot consent to sexual activity, they are too young to understand, and it is an act of adults, not for children (who deserve a real childhood!
The link i gave you in my last comment, even proves Aisha was his child wife, as it is admitted, here is the proof:
"Footnote 1958 on p.715 says in part: "According to Imam Shafi’i, marriage in childhood is not something appreciable. It was under some exceptional circumstances that Hadrat ‘A’isha was married to the Prophet (may peace be upon him). The second point to be noted is that Islam has laid down no age limit for puberty for it varies with countries and races due to climate, hereditary, physical and social conditions. Those who live in cold regions attain puberty at a much later age as compared with those living in hot regions where both male and female attain it at a quite early age. "The average temperature of the country or province,’ says the well-known authors of the book Woman, "is considered the chief factor here, not only with regard to menstruation but as regards the whole of sexual development at puberty. … Similarly, the author of Kinsey Report states: ‘The incidence of pre-adolescent sex play at particular ages (active incidence) seems to have been highest in the younger age groups. Some eight per cent of the females in the sample recalled pre-adolescent hetero-sexual play at ages five and seven" (Alfred C. Kinsey and Others, Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female, p.110)" -- All of this was quoted from Sahih Muslim vol.2 footnote 1958 p.715."
This justifies Mohammed's paedophilia, by stating that the difference in temperature causes young girls to go through puberty sooner than young girls in colder temperatures do. Even if this is true, it does not make having sex with a child, who is neither grown enough, nor wise enough to understand sex, or consent to it acceptable. That is like saying, if a child of three years old has a period, they are ready for sex - which they are not, they deserve a childhood, which does not include raping them! Anyone who thinks otherwise is sick! Mohamed was a paedophile! I have given the proof!
The worst thing about this, is you defend a religion, which not only oppresses women, but it also teaches paedophilia!
This stupid religion, is not one of peace, but of hate and perversion! Anyone who considers that a good example to follow, is either a retard or pervert themselves! "
This comment, was reported to be offensive and i was unable to publish it. However it is in no way offensive, nor is it inaccurate. I have put this in to a very short blog post, for the purpose of proving that we are in no way free, we are unable to state the truth, because this horrific truth as is mentioned above, would incite racial hatred. But does it not seem sick to protect a religion, which teaches about paedophilia?
If we are unable to speak out against such sick acts of paedophilia - which are taught to all worshippers of the Qu'ran, is that not the same as protecting paedophilia?
This very short article is for the benefit of those who attempt to stop free speech, i will post it up on the group, to again prove that "Mohamed" was a paedophile! I shall expect to be deleted from face book for telling the truth, but that only further proves my point! On a final note, i will add the link which i provided to this group, proving Mohamed married Aisha at the age of six and consummated his marriage to her, when she was at the age of nine, Mohamed was fifty three:
http://www.muslimhope.com/AishaNine.htm
"there is nothing racist with wanting a betta future for us and our kids future. there is 2 things wrong with this country GOVERMENT and IMMIGRANTS and RELIGION. this group is not about colour, religion or nationality that is not the problem people can be what ever they want to be so long as it doesnt affect others . its about being realistic . lets put an example . the country is a bridge and the goverment has put that much pressure on the bridge with all the problems that we go through everyday as normal people not upper class people and the only way to relieve the pressure would be to get the goverment sorted to ease the pressure . but how can they when the immigrants are jumpin on top of the bridge that will crumble and will take a long time sort out . the question is do you a) shut the borders till the goverment sorts the country out so it can help its own people and then open the borders to help people in need or do you b)while the pressure on the bridge is at breaking point do you let the immigrants jump on and let the whole country crumble so we cant help anybody. this is not racist this is being a realist lets fight for our country while we stilll have a chance . its your choice and your kids futures lets sort the goverment and shut the borders until the bridge can support us and the immigrants . and lets get rid of religous extremists hate preachers as well how can this not be racist with there hatred they shout out in our town centres and in our streets . lets get the goverment put back in there place cause the elderly are suffering and our kids are suffering lets get the priorities right elderly built us and fought for us and the kids are the future to keep buildin the country and protectin the country and we are whos trying to keep the bridge strong . this is not racistist this is being a realist stand up and be proud .then chuck the problem of religion on top if u want to believe in a religion that is supposedly peaceful then thats upto u but dont expect me to agree with it . as i see it if there was such a thing as a god then why is there so much pain and sufferin happenin in the world why is there so many differant religions and 1 god or in some religions a number of gods . yet nobody has seen or heard anything from him or her or whatever it is. so how can u worship something that u know nothing about but what certain people have told u or wrote in a religous book. all i can say is seein and hearin is believin and until i see or hear from god with my own eyes or ears i just cant understand what all the fuss is about some people would rather be known for there religious identity rather than there birth place national identity . its not god who helps u when something bad happens to u or your family its other human beings and in some cases its these religions that are causin the bad things like sexual abuse , honour killings , war, extreme terror or torture so how is this so called peaceful religion responsible for so many deaths over the years and this day and age . i think its time to look at the future without this ball and chain or noose around our necks that is being tightend by GOVERMENT,RELIGION AND IMMIGRATION who agrees. england till i die rule britannaia"
It all sounds very noble, doesn't it? Sadly this is just rhetoric. Facebook, will not allow the publication of comments which show that Islam is a religion of hate and paedophilia, even if it proves such. The fact is, freedom of speech no longer exists, we live in a police state, even social networks are controlled. We cannot even express our views on the Internet. In this very messed up ideology, we are forced to express views we do not agree with, that are not our own. Such as calling "Mohamed" a prophet - he is not a prophet, especially if you are not a follower of Islam. We now also have to refer to the "Qu'ran" as holy book, which again, if it is not your religion, then it is not a holy book. If you were to read verses from the Qu'ran (without personal comments, just straight forward verses) you can be arrested for inciting racial hatred. Does this not make you wonder why this book needs protecting by laws? What could possibly be found so offensive by whites in the Qu'ran, that we are not allowed to read aloud from it? Could that be the true sick nature of the Islamic religion? Lets find out below shall we?
The below comment, was unable to be published, since it would be seen as offensive on facebook:
"It is fact that Aisha was Mohammed's wife, and his favourite. : http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:hGjPTB9cDLgJ:www.lastprophet.info/en/content/view/787/1/+Aisha+beloved&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk
She was six years old when he married her, and nine when he "raped" her, although the official story states he consummated the marriage when she was nine - it was rape, a child cannot consent to sexual activity, they are too young to understand, and it is an act of adults, not for children (who deserve a real childhood!
The link i gave you in my last comment, even proves Aisha was his child wife, as it is admitted, here is the proof:
"Footnote 1958 on p.715 says in part: "According to Imam Shafi’i, marriage in childhood is not something appreciable. It was under some exceptional circumstances that Hadrat ‘A’isha was married to the Prophet (may peace be upon him). The second point to be noted is that Islam has laid down no age limit for puberty for it varies with countries and races due to climate, hereditary, physical and social conditions. Those who live in cold regions attain puberty at a much later age as compared with those living in hot regions where both male and female attain it at a quite early age. "The average temperature of the country or province,’ says the well-known authors of the book Woman, "is considered the chief factor here, not only with regard to menstruation but as regards the whole of sexual development at puberty. … Similarly, the author of Kinsey Report states: ‘The incidence of pre-adolescent sex play at particular ages (active incidence) seems to have been highest in the younger age groups. Some eight per cent of the females in the sample recalled pre-adolescent hetero-sexual play at ages five and seven" (Alfred C. Kinsey and Others, Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female, p.110)" -- All of this was quoted from Sahih Muslim vol.2 footnote 1958 p.715."
This justifies Mohammed's paedophilia, by stating that the difference in temperature causes young girls to go through puberty sooner than young girls in colder temperatures do. Even if this is true, it does not make having sex with a child, who is neither grown enough, nor wise enough to understand sex, or consent to it acceptable. That is like saying, if a child of three years old has a period, they are ready for sex - which they are not, they deserve a childhood, which does not include raping them! Anyone who thinks otherwise is sick! Mohamed was a paedophile! I have given the proof!
The worst thing about this, is you defend a religion, which not only oppresses women, but it also teaches paedophilia!
This stupid religion, is not one of peace, but of hate and perversion! Anyone who considers that a good example to follow, is either a retard or pervert themselves! "
This comment, was reported to be offensive and i was unable to publish it. However it is in no way offensive, nor is it inaccurate. I have put this in to a very short blog post, for the purpose of proving that we are in no way free, we are unable to state the truth, because this horrific truth as is mentioned above, would incite racial hatred. But does it not seem sick to protect a religion, which teaches about paedophilia?
If we are unable to speak out against such sick acts of paedophilia - which are taught to all worshippers of the Qu'ran, is that not the same as protecting paedophilia?
This very short article is for the benefit of those who attempt to stop free speech, i will post it up on the group, to again prove that "Mohamed" was a paedophile! I shall expect to be deleted from face book for telling the truth, but that only further proves my point! On a final note, i will add the link which i provided to this group, proving Mohamed married Aisha at the age of six and consummated his marriage to her, when she was at the age of nine, Mohamed was fifty three:
http://www.muslimhope.com/AishaNine.htm
i agree with the freedom of speech being a lie . if it wasnt a lie why is there a conspiracy law that can be used for not commitin a crime just the thought of commitin a crime this is free speech but if they choose it can become a conspiracy and that proves free speech is a lie .the group u have been commentin on face book is mine and i have encounterd all kinds tryin pick faults with my opinion which is my use of free speech but to the uaf or liberests it is conspiracy . feel free to comment or post on my group anytime or inbox me with your views . REALIST NOT RACIST (BRITISH PRIDE) rob lewis
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment rob.
ReplyDeleteThis is true, some people try and justify the lack of free speech - by saying that "you can say what you want, so long as you do not offend anyone", this silly idea states that it is entirely possible to have an opinion, and never offend anyone. TRUE free speech, has no restrictions. Because every opinion will offend at least somebody. For example, a vegetarian, may be offended by a discussion on meat. I exercise my right to free speech, and urge others to do the same.
Please read my other articles, and let me know what you think.
I will definitely be commenting on your group. I have recently been disabled, and had to start another account up. I am writing an article explaining why I was deleted from facebook so please read it when it is finished.
Tinypuss.